Author: blass uri
Date: 06:29:34 09/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 1999 at 05:25:25, Harald Faber wrote: >On September 27, 1999 at 04:40:27, blass uri wrote: > >>On September 27, 1999 at 02:43:06, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>Heh, heh. Hiarcs7.32 should have been totally in it's own class, but SSDF tells >>>the truth again! Single computer engine-engine play doesn't tell much yet... >>>And Fritz 6 is much stronger. >>> >>>Jouni >> >>The problem with hiarcs7.32 is the book and it is more important when you use >>fast hardware. >> >>SSDF says nothing about Hiarcs7.32 with a better book. >> >>SSDF says gives CM6000 better rating than Fritz5.32 on the same hardware so it >>is not clear if they say Fritz5.32 is number 1. >> >>The ssdf says that Fritz5.32(K6-450) did not play a big number of games and the >>rating of it may be changed so it is not clear if Fritz5.32 is really number 1. >> >>I expect the rating of Fritz5.32 to go down in the future when it plays against >>better opponents. >> >>Uri > >I'd expect Fritz at least to keep the rating because of the excellent >booklearning function. I do not believe it is possible that Fritz on K6-450 is more than 100 points elo better than Fritz on p200MMX . Fritz played many games against most of the opponents(the list is not based on 5 games of Fritz against 20 different opponent) so I do not expect learning to help Fritz to get better rating. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.