Author: KarinsDad
Date: 09:01:54 10/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 1999 at 00:57:15, Les Fernandez wrote: [snip] > >Thanks for your explanation. The EP is clever and I can't help think that there >must be a way (not to tricky) to shave some additional bits from the picture. I >know alot of you guys have worked on a bunch of things but my mind is not >letting go yet <s>. Go for it. I have been attempting to compress them into 20 bytes (160 bits) or less for the last 6 months or so. I believe (unless I have made a mistake) that I have an algorithm that does 161 bits or less (out of 351 different cases, 13 of them require 161 bits, the rest require 160 bits or fewer). It would be interesting (although not really useful) if someone could get to that magical 160 bit level, just in order to say that it could be done. It would be good to have some competition since I think most everyone else here that was thinking about it has basically given up on it. KarinsDad :) Well onward and upward. I guess thats not a good phrase to >use here, should have been onward and DOWNward <s>.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.