Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 10:46:15 11/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 1999 at 13:34:42, Dann Corbit wrote: >On November 19, 1999 at 10:16:00, Randy Schmidt wrote: >>On November 19, 1999 at 07:03:59, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>On November 19, 1999 at 06:48:03, odell hall wrote: >>> >>>>On November 19, 1999 at 04:08:22, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>> >>>>>From SSDF: >>>>> >>>>>1½01110011½1½111111111111½1½½10½11½11111 32.0/40 Tiger 12 amd-450 >>>>>0½10001100½0½000000000000½0½½01½00½00000 8.0/40 Nimzo 99 200mmx >>>>> >>>>>12 wins in row against 2567 program! I wonder if Garry Kasparov can repeat this? >>>>>Actually I can bet $100 that he can't. >>>>> >>>>>Jouni >>>> >>>> >>>> Are you saying Tiger won 12 straight games one on top of the other? or do you >>>>mean twelve games with draws in between? If you mean the latter, I think that >>>>Kaspy could match this quite easily, especially if the program is running on a >>>>pent 200 and time control is 40/2. >>> >>>As You see it won 12 games straight and with changing colors (WBWBWB..)! >>> >>>Jouni >> >>Please note that tiger gets a V-12 engine with turbo boost and Nimzo has a >>4-cylinder engine with diluted fuel. >Of course. Since the hardware was published, that is clear. However, the >opponent has a known and very good rating. Just pretend that Nimzo isn't Nimzo, >but rather a chess player who lives in a black box named Wally (the box is named >Wally, the player is anonymous). Anyway, this player has an ELO of 2572 in his >club of very good players!!! Now, Wally plays against C.T. and gets his ever >loving butt kicked. Are you impressed now? I know I am. > >>Show us this on equal machines :) >Better yet, reverse the machines and try again. I'll suspect Chess Tiger may >win on the P200 (but it will be a lot closer). In order for a really >significant statistical test, hundreds of games should be played. > >One thing is clear, Tiger has teeth, claws, and knows how to use them. > >Proposal to those who don't like unequal hardware: >Pretend that it is not a computer opponent at all but a faceless guy who is a >great tactician but not such a great strategist; who has a high ELO and will >play for hours on end. He's kind of boring and won't talk about anything >interesting. All he does is play all day. He doesn't get his feelings hurt >when he loses and does not get excited when he wins. So his feelings don't get >hurt. > >But don't think that way about Chess Tiger. I think she's a girl. So pretend >it's a lady in the box. Am I right C. T.? Actually just before I named it "Chess Tiger" this program has been called "Tigress" for several months! Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.