Author: John Warfield
Date: 17:36:17 12/12/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 1999 at 18:05:35, Ed Schröder wrote: >>Posted by Len Eisner on December 12, 1999 at 13:22:30: > >[ snip ] > >>Now I am beginning to see that SSDF ratings do not reflect performance against >>humans period. Going back to my example, program B could actually be weaker >>than program A against GMs, even though it is 50 points stronger in SSDF comp >>vs. com testing. >> >>I guess this is what Ed Schroder has been saying all along about Rebel. I >>need to think about this for a while. > >The MAIN difference I noticed: in comp-comp both programs (in many cases) >can afford (multiple) small to big positional mistakes. Try this against >a GM, one little mistake and you lose. The REBEL-HOFFMAN game was a >perfect example of this. > >Ed The rebel hoffman game was lost because rebel crashed remember? > >>Len
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.