Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 15:18:37 01/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2000 at 17:51:24, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 18, 2000 at 17:28:29, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On January 18, 2000 at 14:45:56, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>It might be an interesting test to trace backwards from the solution to see >>>exactly how deeply computers *can* find the solutions (or it may also reveal if >>>there is a bug in them). >> >>It is of major concern. These lines are important >>for programmers: "what positionevaluation(s) or problem(s) in search >>does my program not play move X". > >I think a reason it would be good to trace backwards is that (for some >positions) we may find the stumbling block in our evaluation. Conversely, it >may help us to reason out a special extension, or improve our positional >evaluation. > >Once we find the pivotal point (we can't get past here) we can ask "Why can't >we?" > >If we know the answer to the question, we may be able to overcome the problem. Right. For some reason i feel i'm enthusiastically reading everything you write on this subject but am hardly gonna show analysis except from Deep Blue against some dude :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.