Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:49:51 01/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2000 at 19:44:04, Chris Carson wrote: >On January 20, 2000 at 18:46:20, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>And if the TPR of DB was 12, then Rebel is much better. But it's not. You >>can't count old DT matches in with DB. It does not make any sense at all. And >>look at the TPR of the final incarnation of DB. I'd say it's a tad over that >>range. > >DB TPR on 6 games was 2670, DB II TPR was 2872 on 6 games. >see: http://www.icdchess.com/ccc/message.html?90306 > >Comercial programs on 400 MHZ machines and above have TPR's >of 2770, 2714, 2552, 2537, 2605, 2591) played over 23 games. >http://www.icdchess.com/ccc/message.html?89955 > >Close or better than DB and between 100 to 150 points to DBII. > >IMHO: >DB could not consistently beat the commercial programs on todays >hardware and DBII would struggle. :) >> Considering how a single DT machine waxed the micros, I suspect the present programs would have a tougher time than you think. <<
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.