Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: DT and DB (prototype) vs Computers

Author: Chris Carson

Date: 12:05:18 01/24/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 24, 2000 at 12:10:37, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>
>I don't understand your last column.  What does it mean.  IE you have
>data for that after one game...  which would be impossible if it means
>TPR over last 25 games...  IE rebel lost the first game it played in your
>list, yet the 25 game TPR is 2546... so I assume I am not understanding
>your chart.

The TPR has been calculated and posted in a different post.  If you
want to see the TPR on hardware, see the other post.  I have posted
these games several times now, they are 40/2 and 40/90 +30 sec/move.
Accepted by USCF and FIDE as "regular".

I noticed that the DT games include G/30 and G/60 and G/90.  USCF
accepts these as "regular" but I have not included any for Rebel
at those time controls yet (I have them and the ratings go up fast).

Averages are base on 25 games, so take the fist and add the next
24 to them.

Question:  Why do you include G/30, G/60, G/90 for DT, but
do not include them for micros.  If those are not the correct
games then post, these are the games for DT from the source you
referred to.

Where is the url, I never saw it.

Best Regards,
Chris Carson



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.