Author: Dan Newman
Date: 15:20:03 02/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2000 at 13:25:34, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On February 01, 2000 at 12:22:02, Mike Carter wrote: > >>I started writing a Visual Basic chess program but have decided to migrate to >>C++. Checking out Microsoft compilers, the Enterprise version of 6.0 seems to >>be overkill (and at $1300 out of price range!). Microsoft's Standard version of >>C++ 6.0 is about $100 and the Professional version is $550. Assuming I'm using >>this to write chess code exclusively, is the extra $450 justified to move up to >>Professional? Or is another company (e.g. Borland) a better choice/value? (If >>it matters, I have a Pentium II 400 MHz with 128Mb RAM and would eventually like >>to port the program to WinBoard). Many thanks in advance for your opinion! >> >>Mike Carter (MrMike on ICC) >>mcarter@tdi.net > >I have recently been in contact with someone who owns the "standard" edition. >I'm not 100% certain, but it seems that this edition does NOT do optimizations. > >A compiler that does not do optimizations is a waste of money, because you can >get GCC for free, and it does a respectable job of optimizing. VC does a better >job, but not $550 better... :) > >Actually, VC has a decent IDE and a pretty good online help system; this may be >worth $100 to you. > >I know I'm going to get flamed for saying this, but current Borland products are >crap. They produce slow programs, and the IDEs are poorly implemented and >totally bug-ridden. (To be fair, the last time I used a Borland compiler was 2 >years ago, and the situation may have improved since then.) > >-Tom I (briefly) had the "standard" edition and returned it. As I recall it did do optimizations, but it didn't give you any way to control them--other than on/off--which wasn't acceptable... And it had no profiler... -Dan.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.