Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 18:56:22 04/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 04, 2000 at 20:42:13, leonid wrote: >Tom, there are few very basic things that can say you the difference in >expectation of which racing car could be the best. That car that have more horse >power (raw power) in its engin. Later you can go about dynamics and all other >billion details that can obscure or make even more prominent this basic >advantage. In chess program it is the same. > >When in my "mate solving logic" I found that my "quick logic" give me wrong >message, and my raw speed is not what it must be, I stayed still for two years >with it. I left working on mate solver only when I found that I came to the >place where I wanted to be. My intention is to do the same this time. Only now >it is not that simple. I don't even know where I am right now. > >Leonid. That's why test suites and autoplayers exist. How does your program score on WAC? BK? BT2xxx? etc. How does it score against GNU Chess? Crafty? etc. -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.