Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: WMCCC - may the best man at getting the fastest hardware win :(

Author: Chris Whittington

Date: 05:51:28 10/23/97

Go up one level in this thread

On October 23, 1997 at 08:37:24, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On October 23, 1997 at 04:39:31, Chris Whittington wrote:
>>Go grub around in my recent posts. You'll find the numbers were given
>>BEFORE you asked for them.
>>If  you want to try and deflect the criticism with red herrings, at
>>least use herrings that haven't already been netted.
>I did, and I found *nothing* useful.

Not looking hard enough then.

> Let me rephrase:
>  the basic AMD K6/233 has a performance factor of 1.0 in this
>discussion.  The PII/300 is "ok" by your definition, yet it is faster
>than the K6.  Perhaps 20%.  But that is "ok".
>Now what I want you to say is that the above represents your thought
>before I give you a little simple math that will show that the 500mhz
>alphas are in the same ballpark with the PII/300.

Are you able to phrase anything in non-arrogantese ?

>I want an *exact* multiplier that you find acceptable.  IE 1.2X is OK.
>You haven't done that.  You only say PII is ok, alpha is not.  I want a
>number to work with...  simple, really...

I've given one already. Go look for it.


This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.