Author: blass uri
Date: 09:21:02 05/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 28, 2000 at 09:20:47, Paulo Soares wrote: >On May 27, 2000 at 23:35:09, blass uri wrote: > >>On May 27, 2000 at 23:22:20, blass uri wrote: >><snipped> >>>I believe that computer programs are at IM level inspite of the fact that the >>>IM's have the right to use programs to help them and that my level is better >>>than the average IM level at correspondence games. >> >>I can add that I believe that most chess players can be better than the average >>IM in correspondence games when both sides can use programs if they know to give >>programs many hours to calculate and are careful not to trust programs only in a >>small number of cases when they are sure that the program is wrong. >> >>Uri > >I agree, a chess player with FIDE rating around 2000 ELO, that knows as using >in an appropriate way the team Human+Computer, can be at the level of a IM >ICCF. My claim was that a computer with no help can be at the level of an average IM ICCF. I believe that a computer with help can be at better level(maybe GM level) My experience that in my case human+computer has better score than an IM The IM has 4.5 out of 6 and one game that he is going to lose against me and I have 4 out of 4 and 2 games that I am going to win and one that I am probably going to draw but I still try to win. >I think that the best for the team human+computer is: > >1. To give a long time so that only the program analyzes > the position. >2. To analyze for a long time, with the help of the program, > the chosen program move, and other moves that are interesting in the > player's opinion. >3. Not to participate simultaneously of many tournaments. > >Paulo Soares, from Brazil I agree Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.