Author: Alessandro Damiani
Date: 02:32:16 06/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2000 at 23:18:54, Christophe Theron wrote: >On June 13, 2000 at 16:53:39, Eugene Nalimov wrote: > >>Combine two approaches -- 0x88 and 10x12. Use 12x16 board, and access board by >> board[0x20+square] >>(In C/C++ you can define macro for that). >> >>Than in each case you can use more appropriate of 2 methods. > > >Well actually Eugene it is what I do already. Sorry, I should have stated this >more clearly in my post. I don't use 12x12 or 10x12. I use 16x16 (actually I >just need 16x12). > >I don't even need to add 0x20... That's why I think 16x12 is more efficient than >0x88, and this comes from close examination of what a typical chess program does >most of the time. > > > Christophe The next step are bitboards. Alessandro
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.