Author: Peter Schreiner
Date: 20:39:00 12/26/97
Subject: Re: M-Chess Pro7 : strength ?? From: Thorsten Czub E-mail: mclane@prima.ruhr.de Message Number: 13268 Date: December 25, 1997 at 15:44:53 In Reply to: Re: M-Chess Pro7 : strength ?? Message ID: 13266 Posted by: Fernando Villegas At: ferdinan@cmet.net On: December 25, 1997 at 14:54:04 >And Mchess7 computed the first time in the 38th move. >BTW: I am using 2x k6/200 with 60/60 time-control. >I am using /x mode for both programs. This is impossible !!!! Please can you explain us, how you get MChess 7.0 working in the X-Mode ???? MChess 7.0 + MChess 7.1 didn`t support any "X-Mode" .......you `ll often have problems with MMX-Cpu`s, so Marty let this mode out. Perhaps you should read the manual a little bit, before you give us your "expert statement" here .... In Paris MChess 7.0 played with the normal mode, using Himem.Sys ..... -Peter Chris Wittington wrote : > I want to defend Mchess. > Thank you very much !!!!!! >Because, in these arguments over the past few days, I'm reminded of >Stalin's dictum from the 1930's. He said that *intentions* were >irrelevent. If the *result* of your actions were counter-revolutionary, >then you were a counter-revolutionary - and should therefore be shot. No >matter that you were trying to fulfill the plan if you made a mistake >and failed - you were to be shot. >Now Mchess has a learning feature - it tries an opening; if it comes out of the line with a minus, it remembers and tries another move later. if it comes out plus, it remembers and extends the book. This way it builds a book where 'bad' theory gets rejected; and a new Mchess idea gets tried. If the 'new' idea works, it becomes part of the book,> It works !!!!!!! >Hence the later computer games of mchess where it plays as per some Gm or Im game >up to move 38, amd then there's another move, never seen before, or >other move series never seen before. So Mchess extends chess knowledge >via autoplayer games. They then release with the new book; and the ng's >start to skweak. >The *effect* is counter-revolutionary, while the *intent* was greater knowledge. >You guys argue to shoot Sandro Nechi. Instead you should be applauding >him. That `s it ! In my view it`s legal, to give the programm the best lines. Nobody will prevent you Jeroen, to make it better !!!!!! -Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.