Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:20:44 11/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2000 at 04:35:35, Andreas Stabel wrote: >On October 31, 2000 at 18:23:35, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On October 31, 2000 at 07:06:36, Andreas Stabel wrote: >> >>>On October 31, 2000 at 00:28:55, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>> >>>>On October 30, 2000 at 22:49:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 30, 2000 at 21:30:09, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>>> >>>>>>I just went and checked to see what Crafty has been doing recently, and it has >>>>>>been idle for 44 minutes. It has played four games in the past eight hours. It >>>>>>has played seven games so far today and it played eight yesterday. >>>>>> >>>>>>It doesn't seem that you need to worry that much about people hogging it. If >>>>>>Crafty has been idle for 45 minutes, why not play against a Tiger? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>This is not real common. And Murphy's law often strikes. IE I logged on >>>>>Friday and had two different complaints from humans that got interrupted. >>>> >>>>Just checked again and guess what? Idle: 44 >>>> >>>>bruce >>> >>>What's itching you. There are litterally tens of craftys you can play any >>>time. There is scrappy which has the same hardware as crafty, you can >>>download the source or an executable yourself. You have hundreds of other >>>options, but still you go on and on like a five year old child wanting >>>candy about playing exactly the one crafty which is reserved for strong >>>human opponents. >>> >>>What is your real motivation for this nonsence ? >>> >>>Andreas Stabel >> >>I think you may have me confused with someone who doesn't like or respect Bob. >> >>bruce > >The reason for my post above is the bickering about beeing alowed to play >one of the many craftys available, when even the source is free and people >can set crafty up in any configuration they want and play it. > >A lot of this bickering is pretty vicious in the tone and completely >unwarranted for the reasons statet above and from the reasons Mr. Hyatt has >given, causing my perhaps too harsh statement above. > >But I have not got you confused, because the following line from the post >above: >--- >>> >--- >>>Just checked again and guess what? Idle: 44 >--- >>> >--- >>>bruce >shows that you are also part of the bickering, so my statement stands. > >Best regards >Andreas Stabel Bruce is not part of the bickering. Bruce only responded to hyatt. Bruce talked about facts and did not complain. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.