Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:22:56 11/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2000 at 08:57:38, Mogens Larsen wrote: >>CSTal2.03: d8 88" +1.16 Qg5 b6 Bxb6 Rf8 Bc5 Rf6 Bg6 Qxa3 >>Shredder4: d11/23 1'23" +1.07 Qe7 e5 Rh4 d4 fxe5 Qc3 ... >>Gandalf4: d9 ~ 1' +0.86 Bg6 e5 Rg3 Qd2 Rxe5 Qc1+ Kg2 >>Hiarcs7.32: d9/27 1'11" +1.84 Qe7 e5 Rg3 exf4 Rg2 >>Fritz6: d11/34 1'44" +0.72 Qe7 e5 Rh4 d4 Qxe5 Bc6... >>Junior6: d16 1'39" +1.06 Qe7 >>CMaster6000:d3/8 1'46" +0.71 Qg5 Qd2 Qe5 Rc6 Bg6 >>Why do you believe black is NOT lost here ?! >>IMO the position is very clear. black is shortly before execution. >Because the position used by Bob is after Kh1 (see diagram), while your analysis >is before. Hi Mogens, nice to here from you again ! the position after Kh1 is IMO also lost. >And the reason why Gambit Tiger couldn't execute the attack was also >misevaluation. The argument that it found the right move later is irrelevant, >because the same can be argued on behalf of Crafty using a previous move I >imagine. ?! the mistake is IMO 41.Rxe6 >Your explanation is utter nonsense as usual. as usual you are very friendly, dear mogens. >The truth is that GT had a winning >attack, blundered and got lucky in the end when Crafty played Ne8. This happens >in numerous computer chess games without any of them belonging to a new >paradigm. ok - you and bob still believe gambit-tiger is normal and there is no new paradigm. you both belong to the old paradigm cheerleader-group. i wish you much luck for the future. And still would advise you to buy chess-base products. they are really the best products (for you). thank you mogens for your very wise contribution to this computerchess-group. i am sure your constructive comments have helped us a lot. >Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.