Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 14:03:32 12/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 2000 at 16:59:59, Paul Doire wrote: >On December 03, 2000 at 15:34:48, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On December 03, 2000 at 13:25:00, Paul Doire wrote: >> >>>I am attempting same pc engine matches. It has been brought to my attention >>>that Didziz has a page that describes the procedure for proper comparison. >>>I have attempted to implement his suggestions(comparing think times with other >>>prog running in background). >>>But CM6000 doesn't have ability in "think lines" to measure nodes, only depth >>>such as 4/09,5/10.Rebel 11 and CM8000 do have the ability to measure nodes. >>>Is there a universal nodes measurement utility available so I can properly >>>gauge nodes per second??? >>> >>>I have attempted "Depth" searches but am unsure if accurate,Chess Tiger >>>searches to depth of ten with CM6000 running in background in only 2.6 secs. >>>While CM6000 takes 42 secs to get to 5/10 with Chess Tiger in background. >>>Is it possible for Chess Tiger to search over 16 times faster??? >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Paul >> >>Does one card whose engine is turning 4500 RPM's go 1.5 times faster than one >>whose engine is turning 3500 RPM's? >> >>The RPM figure is useful, but only in context of gear ratio. >> >>It is very difficult for chess programmers to supply you with gear ratio >>figures, but RPM's are easy. >> >>You can't compare them, because the gear ratio isn't supplied. >> >>Perhaps some programs have search in their eval. You do less nodes if you count >>a three-ply search as one node. >> >>Who knows? >> >>bruce > >I guess a better term to use is each progs CPU usage regardless of task >at hand,then one could allocate proper time based on each progs cpu"hoggage"!!?? > >Paul That's the thing, they are all using 100% of it constantly. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.