Author: Hans Christian Lykke
Date: 06:31:12 02/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2001 at 00:34:16, Aaron Tay wrote: >1) Can someone summarise for me what the main well known test suites are? > >Besides WAC that is..I used to recall a webpage that compared this and someone >help? > >2) Given all the complains about the uneven quality of Rating lists, what >factors would you look for in deciding if a rating list is a quliaty one? > >Eg > >* Number of games >* testing procedures [handling of bugs in book learning etc] >* Quality of testers [Would fewer quality testers be better than lots?] >* Transparancy [availability of games?, policy statements,audits? ] >* Perceived indepedence >* Hardware used > > >any more? And how do the various rating lists either by organisations [SSDF], >e-zines [e-bit, selective search] or single persons [eg Frank Quisinsky's list] >compare acording to the citerias? > >It seems to me that SSDF seems to be the mostly superior in most areas, altough, >they need to work on the perceived indepedence part.. I think that SSDF can not be more independent than we are. Complete independent. Venlig hilsen Hans Christian Lykke (SSDF)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.