Author: Tanya Deborah
Date: 23:17:26 04/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 22, 2001 at 12:29:34, Uri Blass wrote: >Tiger14(depth 3)-Deep Fritz(depth 3) 16.5-3.5 >Tiger14(depth 4)-Deep Fritz(depth 4) 7.5-12.5 >Tiger14(depth 5)-Deep Fritz(depth 5) 13-7 >Tiger14(depth 6)-Deep Fritz(depth 6) 14-6 >Tiger14(depth 7)-Deep Fritz(depth 7) 13.5-6.5 >Tiger14(depth 8)-Deep Fritz(depth 8) 10.5-9.5 >Tiger14(depth 9)-Deep Fritz(depth 9) 14-6 >Tiger14(depth 10)-Deep Fritz(depth 10) 9.5-10.5 > >Tiger14(depth 4)-Deep Fritz(depth 3) 17.5-2.5 >Tiger14(depth 5)-Deep Fritz(depth 4) 19-1 >Tiger14(depth 6)-Deep Fritz(depth 5) 18-2 >Tiger14(depth 7)-Deep Fritz(depth 6) 15-5 > >Tiger14(depth 3)-Deep Fritz(depth 4) 6-14 > >Tiger14(depth 4)-Deep Fritz(depth 5) 8-12(this result should be 12.5-7.5 but >deep fritz failed to mate because of having only part of the tablebases and the >engines agreed to a draw in a position that the evaluation was mate against >tiger). > >Tiger14(depth 5)-Deep Fritz(depth 6) 7-13 >Tiger14(depth 6)-Deep Fritz(depth 7) 8-12 >Tiger14(depth 7)-Deep Fritz(depth 8) 7-13 > >The advantage of one ply seems to be very significant in the nunn match and you >can see that the side that searched deeper won in all the matches. > >Deep Fritz at depth X seems to be 100 about elo better than Tiger at depth X-1 >when Tiger14 at depth X seems to be more than 200 elo better than Tiger14. > >It means that at small depthes 1 ply is probably worth at least 150 elo rating >for the nunn match. >There is of course a significant statistical error and we need more games. > >Uri Very interesting Uri! But how did you make that Fritz move when it is on depth4 or 5 ?? I believe that many of this games (at depth 3,4,or5) take only a few seconds. Is this right? If the program using a 8x procesor machine against Kramnink, see one ply more than the normal fast machine, how strong will be ?? in elo?? Tanya.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.