Author: Larry Proffer
Date: 14:04:05 05/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
Given the inconsistencies in the Ed Schroder - Christophe Theron position vis a vis Rebel and Tiger position, participation, withdrawal or whatever in the BGN qualifier, it is not possible to rely, in my opinion, on the statement of Ed Schroder that he did not pursue his entry of Rebel into the qualifier in order to allow him to concentrate on the Tiger entry. Therefore relying on the Ed Schroder - Rebel statement to query the press report "with many of the leading programs, such as Shredder and Rebel, refusing to play" is not justifiable. It is perfectly possible that Rebel 'refused' to play and that the press report is accurate. There is a thin line between not pursueing an entry and pulling it out as a withdrawal. The situation, as with the other events, is exceptionally unclear. On May 03, 2001 at 03:48:39, Larry Proffer wrote: > >In today's UK Telegraph, presumably reproducing verbatim from somebody's press >release, it states: > >1. Sponsorship is Dollars 2 million US. Dollars 0.8mn US to Kramnik if he wins, >0.6mn US if he loses. > >2. That Deep Blue 'flummoxed' Kasparov in 1997 by comfronting him with a >different progam mid-match. > >3. That Kramnik can study the program for a 'few months' in advance, but not its >opening book. > >4. Junior-Fritz contest was organised by 'leading computer chess expert' >professor Enrique Irazoqui at Cadaques in Spain. > >5. There was controversy in computer world because only two programs took part. > >6. Many of the leading programs, such as Shredder and Rebel, refused to play. > >7. In the second half of the Frizt-Junior match, deep Fritz 'changed its >openings' and headed for quiet positions in which it proved superior. > > >I'll quote directly the 'refuse to play' bit: > >"Deep Fritz qualified to play Kramnik by defeating its rival Deep Junior in a >contest organised by leading computer chess expert Professor Enrique Irazoqui at >Cadaques in Spain. There was much controversy in the computer chess world >because only two programs took part, with many of the leading programs, such as >Shredder and Rebel, refusing to play". > >This was the only comment on the 2-play thing.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.