Author: Harald Faber
Date: 02:17:48 07/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 2001 at 04:34:07, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 24, 2001 at 04:23:15, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On July 24, 2001 at 02:44:38, Tony Hedlund wrote: >> >>>On July 24, 2001 at 01:18:47, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>>So you just need to take care that DeepFritz wins the last two games and we get >>>>the standard-Fritz-result. ;-)) >>> >>>I'm writing this from my job. Tonights game was won by Deep Fritz, and it had a >>>small advantage in the opening in the second game. >>> >>>Tony >> >>Hehe, so DeepFritz wins again and remains unbeaten in long term matches. :-)) >>Isn't it strange? It suggests superiority which in fact is not present... > >It is present in long mathces. Yes, maybe, but not in chess. :-) >It is possible that other program may have superiority in the opening book but >after Fritz learns to avoid bad lines it can win matches. > >Uri So SSDF honours the best learner and not the best chess program. ;-) For extreme cases it may lead to DeepFritz playing 5-10 opening lines for black and for white and win matches. Isn't this scenario fantastic? Actually, what is/was the original intention of the SSDF? For Tony: Do you reset the weights in the opening book before you start new matches or do you take over the learned move preferences from former matches?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.