Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:47:11 11/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 2001 at 03:38:59, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On November 27, 2001 at 12:25:01, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>Deep mistakes are _common_ from a computer's perspective. You might think >>they are "tactically supreme" but there are _lots_ of endgame positions where >>they are clueless. And any time you reach such a position, where either it is >>(commonly) a long-range kingside attack (or less commonly) a deep endgame >>tactic, you get random reports. >> >>I simply personlly don't like anything "random" when somebody/something is >>supposed to be telling me where I went wrong. > >Well, without any more information than your gut feelings, I will continue to >believe that the depth of mistakes is evenly distributed. > >-Tom I believe that is what _I_ said. Some are one move beyond the search horizon, some are 20+ moves beyond. Isn't that "distributed". And the farther beyond 5 you go, the more confusing the back-to-front results become. BTW, it isn't a "gut feeling". It is an observed fact, instead...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.