Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 22:29:46 06/16/98
Go up one level in this thread
>Posted by Enrique Irazoqui on June 16, 1998 at 20:22:19: >In Reply to: Re: How Rebel plays at SSDF the bare facts, just statistics and >thoughts posted by Ed Schröder on June 16, 1998 at 19:16:46: >On June 16, 1998 at 19:16:46, Ed Schröder wrote: >>>Posted by Enrique Irazoqui on June 16, 1998 at 18:02:56: >>>Not true. The first version of Fritz’s autoplayer didn’t allow some of the >>>opponents to save their games. >>>As a consequence, Rebel, and only Rebel, could not learn. >>How do you know? >>Did you ask other chess programmers too then? >What for? No other program that played against Fritz 5 in the SSDF matches went >twice for the same losing line, except Comet32 in 2 games. All the other double >games in there are the Fritz5-Rebel9 ones. >Knowing what kind of aggressive learner Fritz 5 has and knowing that >Rebel 9 did not behave like this in other matches, this losing double >games indicate that Rebel's learner was the only one hampered by >Fritz's autoplayer. And who is to blame for that? Rebel9 learner doing well against *ALL* other SSDF participants but not against a hidden secret non public autoplayer that doesn't stick to the general excepted rules of AUTO232 which instead of that created his own rules and what's worse nobody can check. As a result I can't judge what went wrong in these games, next it prevents me to correct it because I don't know the reason. Nice way of competing :) - Ed -
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.