Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 11:19:21 04/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 12, 2002 at 13:29:37, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>On April 12, 2002 at 13:24:17, Roy Eassa wrote:
>
>>On April 12, 2002 at 08:34:10, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>
>>>nemeth-games by Tim Krabbe:
>>>
>>>http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess2/honor.htm
>>
>>
>>One quote from there:
>>
>>"But perhaps Nemeth's greatest invention is an absurd anti-computer gambit that
>>I would like to call the Nemeth Gambit. Using it, he beat five of the world's
>>strongest chess programs in one day.
>>
>> The characteristic position arises after: 1.e4 c5 2.Na3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Bc4
>>Nf6 5.h3 Nxe4 6.Bxf7+ Kxf7 7.Qh5+ Ke6 8.Qg4+ Kd5 9.c4+ dxc3 10.Be3"
>
>Read on, Roy...
>
>(...)
>It is possible that Nemeth (like me) went through some trial-and-error before he
>won these games, but that is not the point; the point is that it is possible to
>beat the strongest chess programs in the world with the Nemeth Gambit, or with
>1.d4 h5 2.e4 e5.
>Of course, computers also find good moves that a human would never think of, and
>they're a great help in analysis, but what I want to demonstrate is that they
>don't "play chess". As the above games show, they have passed the capturing
>test, but they're a long way from passing the Turing test. In spite of all the
>blustering about Kramnik who will "defend humanity's honor against the computer"
>(Der Spiegel) and "gain revenge for the human race" (The Telegraph), his
>upcoming match against some Fritz has, apart from the money involved, no more
>significance than a match between a cat and a book for the greatest weight.
>As a defender of humanity's honor, I prefer Nemeth.
>(...)
>
>
>Regards,
>Otello
Thank fore all answers.
This varioation (full) I played on the Fritzserver in Mashine-Room ***Live**
ageinst Fritz 6 from Manfred Bachman (handle Yoshida):
(Wolkenlos is my handle)
[Event "Wertungspartie, 5m + 0s"]
[Site "Fritz7Server"]
[Date "2001.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Wolkenlos"]
[Black "Yoshida, Fritz6"]
[ECO "B21"]
[Result "1-0"]
1. e4 {2} c5 {0} 2. d4 {2} cxd4 {0} 3. h3 {2} Nc6 {9}
4. Bc4 {18} Nf6 {16} 5. Na3 {1} Nxe4 {11} 6. Bxf7+ {1} Kxf7
{0} 7. Qh5+ {1} Ke6 {5} 8. Qg4+ {1} Kd5 {13} 9. c4+ {1}
dxc3 {4} 10. f3 {1} Nd6 {6} 11. Ne2 {5} Ke5 {0} 12. Bg5 {2}
h5 {18} 13. f4+ {1} Kd5 {7} 14. Nxc3+ {3} Kc5 {8} 15. Qe2
{13} Kb6 {0} 16. Nd5+ {2} Ka5 {5} 17. b4+ {4} Nxb4 {6}
18. Qd2 {1} b5 {8} 19. Qxb4+ {3} Ka6 {0} 20. Rc1 {3} Bb7
{10} 21. Nc7+ {1} Qxc7 {2} 22. Rxc7 {1} Rc8 {5} 23. Rxc8
{3} Bxc8 {0} 24. O-O {5} Bb7 {0} 25. Rd1 {3} Bc6 {6}
26. Rxd6 {6} Kb7 {3} 27. Bxe7 {9} Bxe7 {3} 28. Rxd7+ {1}
Bxd7 {4} 29. Qxe7 {1} Kc8 {2} 30. Qc5+ {1} Kd8 {1} 31. Nxb5
{Yoshida rinde 1} 1-0
Here You see that I not Can win ONLY in my computerroom!
German: ich kannte diese Variante (see game against Fritz 6) und probierte sie
einfach aus auch gegen F7! So einfach war das.
Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.