Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: GM Smirin vs 4 comps - Match Predictions

Author: Roy Eassa

Date: 07:13:33 04/17/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 17, 2002 at 03:04:52, Terry McCracken wrote:

>On April 17, 2002 at 01:31:51, Joe Little wrote:
>
>>On April 16, 2002 at 18:28:36, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>>
>>>On April 16, 2002 at 17:19:13, martin fierz wrote:
>>>>a program which plays a game like shredder vs.
>>>>smirin is just not GM strength. it is 3000+ in tactics and 2000- in positional
>>>>play.
>>>
>>>I think that chess is made over 90% of tactics... so 2700+ is not an optimistic
>>>evaluation.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Otello
>>
>>
>> I agree, seems pretty obvious to me but who am I?
>
>Yes Chess is 90% tactics at least, maybe even 95%! But that would still only
>mean that programmes play around 2700 level in tactics only, not in positional
>play and planning, which is _fundamental_ and till a programme aquires this
>skill in won't be a _complete_ Grandmaster.
>
>Planning is many years away, positional play is advanced a long ways but still
>needs improvement.
>
>Computers will play 2800+ in tactics long before it can actually manage deep
>positional play, let alone planning.
>
>When _all_ weak areas are finally addressed, Computers will be stronger than a
>GM and will win almost all the time, but that is likely many years down the
>road.
>
>However they may be still beating GM's almost consistently when Computers are at
>2800+ at tactics.
>
>Only the best anti-computer play will succeed, against them, although there will
>still be a few players who will win without using anti-computer play, but not
>many.
>
>Terry


Terry, it seems that in many tactical situations today's top programs running on
fast PCs may be Elo 3000+.  That's why it has become so critical for GMs to
adapt their play -- those who don't will lose more games than they win.  But I
think GMs CAN still improve their anti-computer techniques by a very wide margin
(that's not to say that every GM will).

The science of anti-computer techniques is still in its infancy, at least
compared to the traditional chess techniques that have been refined continuously
for centuries.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.