Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 08:21:50 04/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 24, 2002 at 10:31:58, Louis Fagliano wrote: >On April 24, 2002 at 06:14:48, Tina Long wrote: > >>On April 24, 2002 at 02:59:19, Shay Bushinsky wrote: >> >>>Grandmaster Ilya Smirin, leading 3-3, will play his sixth >>>game in the 8 game series. Today he will be playing WHITE >>>against Hiarcs 8, the new version by Mark Uniacke of England >>>running on a P2 2.2GHz. >>>You may watch the games live with grandmaster Boris Alterman >>>commentary + real time evaluations from the playing software + live web cam from >>>the playing venue on www.kasparov.com or join the ChessBase community on the >>>ChessBase game server. >>> >>>Enjoy! >>> >>>For more details, checkout: >>> >>>www.kasparov.com >>>www.chessbase.com >> >>Dillema dillema, >>I suppose Ideally for this game I would like to see GM Smirin win brilliantly >>against an excellent playing error free Hiarcs8. >> >>This is exciting, >> >>Tina Long > > >It's impossible to play error free chess and lose. It's the nature of the game >that, in a loss, the loser MUST have made at least one that, under intense >scrutiny, deserves a question mark. In other words, I'm saying that the opening >position is not a forced win for White! May be Tina Long mean Hiarcs 8 is error free or The Perfect chess program of our time ... This lead to some philosophical questions : 1) what's the level of a perfect chess-program running on PC 8088@4.77 Mhz ? 2) what's the level of a perfect chess-program running on AMD@2000 Mhz ? 3) what's the level of a perfect chess-program running on a super computer with 32 POWERPC processor with 480 specialised chess-chips ? I would say 1) 2000 Elo 2) 3000 Elo 3) 3800 Elo I smell this post will set fire to the forum in some time ... (I decline all responsibilities...) ;))) > >That's why I don't consider a game to have been annotated properly if the >annotator does not identify at least one move for the losing side in a game that >ended decisively with a question mark. To me, that means the annotator doesn't >know where the loser went wrong.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.