Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 04:06:18 04/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2002 at 06:42:55, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 30, 2002 at 02:48:17, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>On April 29, 2002 at 23:55:11, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On April 29, 2002 at 21:28:21, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>Interesting Fritz 1 on a Celeron 433 Mhz search up to depth 13, but Comet B42 on >>>>the same Celeron 433 Mhz can only search up to depth 12. This is when I set it >>>>up to game in 30 minutes. Of course that Comet B42 is about 350 Elo points >>>>higher than Fritz 1, but Comet B42 could be optimized to search higher than 12. >>>> >>>>Pichard. >>> >>> >>> >>>Where have you seen that Comet is 350 elo points higher than Fritz 1.0??? >> >>That's certainly overestimated. I 'd expect Fritz1 still being a tough opponent. >> >>Uli > >I do not know. > >I guess that Fritz1 was never tested on the new hardware >and it is possible that some bug that is relevant only at slower >time control than tournament time control on 386 prevents >it to play well. > >I cannot know based on the data if the claim that >Comet is 350 elo better than Fritz1 is correct or not correct >because we cannot make conclusions based on the rating >of Fritz1 on slow hardware. > >I know that programs may have bugs at long time control >if they are not designed for it. > >One possible problem is that the order of moves can be wrong >at long time control because the program gives score to moves >based on some assumptions that are simply wrong >at long time control. > >Uri I also think, that Fritz1 can be beaten by many of today's amateurs. However, a difference of 350 ELO means that Fritz1 would score essentially 0 % ? I can't believe this. After all, an amateur has first to survive the tactics of the middle game. Uli
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.