Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Ruffian 0.76 is still playing incredible strong!

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:48:14 09/20/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 20, 2002 at 11:49:27, Russell Reagan wrote:

>On September 20, 2002 at 00:42:54, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On September 19, 2002 at 19:58:32, Russell Reagan wrote:
>>
>>>On September 19, 2002 at 17:42:36, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>Such would certainly be required to
>>>>play in any ICGA tournament, for example...
>>>
>>>Which would be required? Showing source or providing an executable?
>>>
>>>Russell
>>
>>
>>Probably both.  The source for inspection, the executable so that the
>>results can be compared to the results produced by a real compile on the
>>"claimed source".
>>
>>IE we once had a famous case of a person with legitimate source code, but
>>they were using a commercial engine.  Compiling the source and comparing
>>it to the "engine being used" cleared that up in an instant.  :)
>
>Are commercial authors ok with this? I would think they wouldn't be overly eager
>to show someone their source. Or does this only occur in the case of suspicion?
>
>Russell


The ICCA/ICGA rules are _very_ specific in that regard.

The only saving grace is that you would never have to show your program source
to a competitor, only to someone on the organizing committee, assuming a protest
was made or a suspicion surfaced...

It has happened in the past.  It probably will happen more in the future as
there are _many_ "suspects" nowadays.  I only follow the "crafty clones" myself
but there are too many of those that have slipped into major (non-ICCA) chess
events...  And even once into an ICCA event.



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.