Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 08:49:27 09/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 20, 2002 at 00:42:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On September 19, 2002 at 19:58:32, Russell Reagan wrote: > >>On September 19, 2002 at 17:42:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>Such would certainly be required to >>>play in any ICGA tournament, for example... >> >>Which would be required? Showing source or providing an executable? >> >>Russell > > >Probably both. The source for inspection, the executable so that the >results can be compared to the results produced by a real compile on the >"claimed source". > >IE we once had a famous case of a person with legitimate source code, but >they were using a commercial engine. Compiling the source and comparing >it to the "engine being used" cleared that up in an instant. :) Are commercial authors ok with this? I would think they wouldn't be overly eager to show someone their source. Or does this only occur in the case of suspicion? Russell
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.