Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:07:43 10/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2002 at 10:31:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On October 28, 2002 at 10:05:29, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 28, 2002 at 09:44:40, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On October 28, 2002 at 09:38:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>I hope you realize that i prefer a time control of 40 in 2. >>>However, if you play blitz levels like 90 0, then you have >>>consequences like this. If you asked me in advance, then >>>i would not have told you to expect that i would get to >>>move 187 at all in a computer-computer game which was >>>hand operated. >>> >>>Both operators played like 50 moves extra with very little time >>>on the clock. >>> >>>If you do not find it fair to win on time, then don't play 90 0 >>>is my viewpoint. I prefer 40 in 2 myself too. If you go 90 0, >>>it is unpreventable that a number of games end in a time win. >> >>It is possible to prevent it if you do not play games manually. >> >>I see no reason to play games manually. >>I see no reason not to play the games automatically in ICC. >> >>Uri > >But this is why your movei will have problems progressing >like GCP is progressing fast now with Sjeng. He talks to the >programmers live and he is there to operate his program. > >I will never trust it if we use some kind of protocol where i >cannot see my opponent. There is too much money at stake with >some people to just *assume* they play honest if you can't see >them. seeing the opponent does not mean playing manually. You can be there see everything when the programs are not operated manually. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.