Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Pondering ("think on opponent's time")

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 06:44:58 11/12/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 12, 2002 at 03:31:58, Uri Blass wrote:

>No
>
>If I see better score in one of the thread with low priority
>or if I see fail low in the main thread then I can increase the priority
>of one of the threads that was given originally low priority.

You are missing the point, or you do not understand how thread priority works.
The thread with a higher priority ALWAYS runs first. The lower priority threads
will almost NEVER get any processing time. Add in the fact that there are 30 or
40 of those threads competing for the "almost never" cpu time they will get, and
not a single one of those threads will produce one bit of useful information.
Your higher priority thread will be searching normally, maybe 10-12 ply deep,
and your other threads will be at 1 or 2 ply and will provide no useful
information for you to determine if another move is better.

>Note that I do not use threads in movei but I guess that I can change the
>priority of a thread during the search.

You can change the priority of threads, but there isn't any point. Just ponder
one move normally, and if you see that the move you are pondering is bad, ponder
a different move. The thread nonsense doesn't help you at all.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.