Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: significant math

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 13:31:33 11/19/02

Go up one level in this thread

On November 19, 2002 at 16:24:36, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On November 19, 2002 at 16:22:14, Russell Reagan wrote:
>
>>You can't prove either to be clearly better than the other, but you can give >evidence that they are comparable in terms of performance.
>
>You haven't done that. You've shown that they reach similar NPS.
>
>NPS =/= performance
>
>--
>GCP


ANd they play similarly when using equal hardware.  Is _that_ also ignorable???

• Re: significant math Gian-Carlo Pascutto 13:33:40 11/19/02
  • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 13:42:21 11/19/02
    • Re: significant math Gian-Carlo Pascutto 13:51:35 11/19/02
      • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 13:53:48 11/19/02
        • Re: significant math Eugene Nalimov 14:15:46 11/19/02
        • Re: significant math Gian-Carlo Pascutto 13:59:29 11/19/02
          • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 15:03:28 11/19/02
            • Re: ftp news Robert Hyatt 15:37:42 11/20/02
            • Re: ftp news Robert Hyatt 15:36:58 11/20/02
          • Re: significant math Eugene Nalimov 14:16:28 11/19/02
  • Re: significant math Russell Reagan 13:38:03 11/19/02
    • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 13:43:31 11/19/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.