Author: Ed Panek
Date: 08:38:37 01/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2003 at 11:35:19, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >On January 22, 2003 at 10:21:47, Ed Panek wrote: > >>Neither side may capitalize on their opponent's inherent weaknesses, i.e. to >>tire on >> the part of the human or the loss of time entering >>moves in the computer (10a). If the >> machine display a draw in its endgame databases the >>game ends immediately in a >> draw (10a). >> >>Interesting..Lets say its down to 7 pieces in the endgame. During this time >>while calculating, Deep Junior sees a variation that will allow Garry to perp >>check the computer. Seeing this line as "best play" by both sides and evalauting >>this as a draw does this mean the game ends in a draw or only when the board has >>5 or fewer pieces? > >You can read below > >10. Etiquette regarding draws: > > a. The contestants voluntarily take upon themselves >to observe etiquette in agreeing > to draws without capitalizing on their opponent's >inherent weaknesses, i.e. the human > player's tendency to tire in a pointless game of many >moves, and the machine's > tendency to lose time through the time taken by its >operator to input the human > player's moves. Should a position be reached which is >in the machine's endgame > databases and if the result from that position with >correct play is a draw, then the > game ends immediately and the machine operator must >promptly advise the human > player and the arbiter that the game has been drawn. > >Miguel > > >> >> >>Ed But wait..Remember in the game Deep Fritz vs Krmanik where DF returned his bishop back to its orignal square thinking Kramnik would also repeat? Wouldnt this also be immediately a draw as well if it happened in its EGTB search? WHat if Kasparov, like Kramnik did, thinks this is fallacy? Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.