Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 15:07:21 02/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2003 at 15:31:41, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 21, 2003 at 09:10:12, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On February 21, 2003 at 08:44:14, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On February 21, 2003 at 08:33:18, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>> >>>>On February 21, 2003 at 08:27:23, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 21, 2003 at 08:18:17, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>>>>BTW can you prove that Shredder is not number 1?, beyond any shadow of a doubt >>>>>>that is. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Yes I can. Look, the three progs at the top are eqally qualified for number one. >>>>>Here is my decision. Fritz has less letters for the same performance so Fritz is >>>>>number one. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>:) >>>>> >>>> >>>>:) >>>> >>>>Thanks for the answer. >>>> >>>>Jonas >>> >>>You're welcome. But if the three progs at the top are all the same qualified to >>>be number one, then how should I be able to prove that one of the three is NOT >>>qualified to be number one. That is simply called a contradiction/nonsense if I >>>did try that. Oh well. Don't tell me that you didn't know all that. >> >>But now that we have established that all three could be number one and no >>matter what we do, that uncertainty will always be there, then critiquing the >>SSDF for inaccuaracy (when they don't claim to present accuracy) seems silly to >>me. >> >>>Criticising is not insulting! Many people don't understand that. >> >>Including you, who took my critique for personal attacks. >> >> The question >>>remains why someone must by all means continue to be faithful to a false method. >> >>Do you have a better method? >> >>>Here exactly we enter lobbyism and /or psychology. >> >>Or maybe they are just content with the way it is now. > >LOL.I never doubted it. But I think they pretend something they don't do. Their >number one is not an independent result. - But look, I thought we had finished >our exchange; to me this is worthless because you simply don't understand my >points. I understand your points i just don't agree... and like i said i am neither for nor aginst the SSDF. Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.