Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 04:58:26 05/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 2003 at 07:51:09, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On May 07, 2003 at 07:10:00, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On May 07, 2003 at 06:37:22, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On May 06, 2003 at 19:54:18, Rex wrote: >>> >>>>On May 06, 2003 at 16:09:01, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>>Indeed the engine is with CB for a while now. CB had a technical delay due to >>>>>>Easter - Junior8 will be released in about 10 days >>>>>> >>>>>>Shay >>>>> >>>>>What are the Beta testers saying in comparison to Shredder7 ? >>>>> >>>>>Jorge >>>> >>>>It will be no different than any other program release. It comes out, people >>>>get it, and gets old after 3 days then wonders when the next release will come >>>>out. >>> >>> Hi Rex >>> Just great comment about the computer chess scene. It comes out, people get >>> it, play some stupid blitz games and after 3 days up to a week are crying >>> for the next version. And as soon as we have 5000 Mhz PC's people are >>> playing games at level 0s+1s ... Crazy chesscomputer world. I will never >>> change my mind: quality is more important than quantity. >>> Kurt >> >>If I don't enjoy bullet it is because I don't have time to see anything during >>the game. But, just to keep things in perspective, bullet today is like slow >>40:2 games of 10 or 15 years ago. If slow games were valid then, why would >>bullet be useless today? >> >>Enrique > > Is this comparison indeed justified. The programs 10/15 years ago had much > less chess knowledge and most programs do not work identical when using > different time controls. > Kurt Put it this way: today's bullet games will be like bullet in 10-15 years. We can take seriously both or none, but not only slow games because of the magic of 40:2. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.