Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fair conditions?!

Author: Mike S.

Date: 05:35:04 11/01/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 01, 2003 at 06:49:46, Sandro Necchi wrote:

>On November 01, 2003 at 04:13:54, Mike S. wrote:
>
>>(...)
>>http://www.miko42.de/DasDuell/duellindex.html
>>excerpt:
>>Index Fritz 8.0.23 - Shredder 7.04       F8 - S7.04 % Fritz % Sh. games
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>01 eigenes Buch - eigenes Buch         131,0 - 145,0 47,5    52,5  276
>>12 eigenes Buch - ohne Buch            143,5 - 151,5 48,6    51,4  295
>>(engl. own book vs. own book, or own book vs. NO book)
>>Without book only 1,1% less! Certainly somewhat surprising. :-)
>>(...)

>At which level the games where made?
>I do not care about blitz and semì-blitz.
>Did you test also at 40/2 games? With which hardware?

I didn't make these tests. These have been run by a different person "Michael42"
(webmaster of the URL above), a german fan.

According to his doc, the games were run on AMD 2200+ at 35m+4s, and on ADM
2700´+ at 30m+3s, and with 256 MB hash.

>(...) I have nothing against you, but to see people so blind still is really
>unbelievable to me...

Excuse me, I was just quoting a result which I thought was very surprising (for
me too!). I took it as a clear hint that opening books really are overrated in
computerchess competition (which is the relation between this and the discussion
about replacing CM9000.OBK with general.ctg).

To be honest, I doubt that general.ctg is any advantage at all compared to
CM9000.OBK, because it's a relatively old Fritz book, which means the
competitors have most probably taken a very close look at it when compiling
their latest books (and I guess nobody cared to prepare for the CM9000 book
and/or it wasn't even released yet). Which would mean, it's more likely to be a
disadvantage compared to CM's own book.

(No, I don't forget about advantages and disadvantages :-)) because when we
forget that, what are we discussing about then?)

So what it happening? The King 3.23 is tested *very late* after it's release
many month ago (meanwhile, some other new and improved versions of other engines
have been released), and with an *old book* which even cannot include
king-specific editing.

But still:

Anger, Despair, Panic!! :-)))

Astonishing, how dangerous an opponent The King is considered obviously, even
under these conditions...

Btw. I'm of course aware of the great value your work has, like the work of all
the other chess programmers and book editors. One out of only two big opening
books I keep on my harddisk, is one of yours.

Regards,
Mike Scheidl



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.