Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Isn't it an easy case?

Author: Roger D Davis

Date: 06:14:41 12/01/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 01, 2003 at 08:01:28, Gabor Szots wrote:

>If an engine is unable to claim draw on repetition, then it is not a draw if the
>opponent plays on. Not a draw even if the same position repeats 10 times.
>If the GUI claims the draw, it is as if a spectator would have claimed it,
>therefore invalid.
>
>It seems to me that Jonny did not recognize draw because it accepted Shredder's
>next move. In this case Shredder was EXTREMELY LUCKY, but nothing illegal or
>unethical happened.
>
>I think it is unimportant that the GUI claimed the draw only when the position
>had in fact repeated 3 times. In a human tournament, if I make my move, STOP THE
>CLOCK, and call the arbiter, my draw claim is still valid. But without the claim
>of the player himself, NOT EVEN THE ARBITER has to right to declare a draw. This
>is what saved Shredder. An unlucky blow for the Fritz team.
>
>Gábor

The Jonny author may well have chosen to let the interface catch the draw,
rather than duplicate that functionality in his engine. Accordingly, the
operator usurped the author's wishes.

Roger



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.