Author: Bruce Humphrey
Date: 19:11:04 07/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 02, 2004 at 00:01:50, Mike Byrne wrote: >On July 01, 2004 at 22:55:30, Bruce Humphrey wrote: > >>On June 30, 2004 at 18:48:13, Mike Byrne wrote: >> >>>On June 30, 2004 at 08:56:28, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>> >>>>[D]2r4k/ppqbpp1p/3p1npQ/3R4/2r1P1P1/2N2P2/PPP1N3/1K5R w >>>> >>>> >>>>I tested this position with the Mach III Master back in 1989, it took about >>>>1hr.09min. to find Rf5!! with the double threat of Rxf6! and Nd5! >>>> >>>>Daniel >>> >>>Pocket PC Genius 1:58 >>>Pocket Grandmaster (Ruffian) ~12:00 >>>Pocket Fritz 2 ~31:20 (on the 12th ply ) >>> >>> >>>Dell Axim 590 Mhz (oc) >> >>Are you sure? You should be getting better results (I expect)! I thought genius >>2.1 for palm was the same soft (basically) than pocket pc genius? Either that, >>or it is true that Pocket PC (operating system) is a resources hog (in >>comparisson with palm and symbian) >> >>In my palm T3 (400 Mhz arm) >>-Hiarcs 9.32 palm: depth 7, 23sec* >>-Genius 2.1 (arm): depth 8, 01:44 , 61880 n/sec >>-Tiger 15.1: depth 8, 04:33** >> >>*- Hiarcs does 'see it' at 18sec, but doesn't select the move until 23 sec >> >>**- In Tiger depth 8, at 180 sec Rf6 is move 31/51. Then at 232 sec it gives it >>a ! (meaning it has discovered it is a lot better than previously thought) and >>it ends selecting it at 273 sec >> >>Bruce Humphrey > >in Genius hashsize matters a lot, tell me what hashsize you ran it at and I will >rerun the test. Didn't know hashsize was so important for genius! I have 8Mb Hash Table, maximum I can set for my palm T3. got same time again with 8Mb, 01:44 Tested it with 256Kb Hash: it searches same nodes per second, more or less, but... takes longer: -02:02 62742/sec Bruce Humphrey
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.