Author: Bryan Hofmann
Date: 06:34:02 08/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 29, 2004 at 08:43:24, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 29, 2004 at 08:27:19, Bryan Hofmann wrote: > >>On August 29, 2004 at 08:07:37, Uri Blass wrote: >> >> >>>it is not fair that only computers has the right to consult by doing parallel >>>search when human opponents have not right to consult by the same way when one >>>human analyze line A and another human analyze line B. >> >>You are comparing Apples to Oranges here. A chess engine would eval a postion >>the same way just faster with 2 CPUs. This would not be the case with 2 humans. > >It is not going to eval faster but to search faster. Play your little symantics game I call it eval not in a Chess programing terms. >The same effect can be also achieved by humans. >The 2 humans may have different evaluation function and it may be a relative >disadvantage but humans have other advantages in consulting and they can decide >to consult in that way only in part of the positions and in another part to >discuss which plan to choose or they can discuss the reason for their evaluation >and one human may convince the second human to change his evaluation. > The key work above is MAY, try getting two humans to agree on 50 moves in a chess game.... >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.