Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 02:02:52 01/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2004 at 10:24:46, Ulysses Omycron wrote: >I'm not questioning your analysis (Although yourself called that useless), but I >bet a Deep Position Analysis would been better. > >Just run a DPA with your favorite time and root times, with all Branches 24 for >both sides with 4 (Or you can start from anywhere, but lower than 4 is not >recommended) Lenght of variations and a small Evaluation windows (Since you are >not interested in 3rd/4th best moves) and let it run. > >Then run in again increasing the Lenght of variations to 5, then 6 and so until >you use all your days. You may need to give ? annotations to the moves that lead >to nowhere but this way you won't only finnish with a more accurate result, you >also have a tree with all the optimal moves and their values. > >That's how I'm trying to solve chess, but since you only want the best moves >from both sides, you'd be prunning a lot of variations. > >I think that would be "less useless" than just know if Bc4 is better than Bd5 by >0.20 points. > >Wishing you get Santa to give you a present January 7. ;) I wish you a very good year 2005 ! ;-) The problem with this methode is that you can miss a good move at the first move because of a deep fail high, this kind of thinks can happen especially when a king is in open air ... With your method it's very difficult to find a move like : Nxh6 ! r3qb1k/1b4p1/p2pr2p/3n4/Pnp1N1N1/6RP/1B3PP1/1B1QR1K1 w - - 0 1
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.