Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Assembler Question

Author: James Robertson

Date: 12:40:06 01/27/99

Go up one level in this thread


On January 27, 1999 at 15:00:37, Eugene Nalimov wrote:

>On January 27, 1999 at 14:50:59, James Robertson wrote:
>
>>On January 27, 1999 at 01:32:28, Eugene Nalimov wrote:
>>
>>>On January 26, 1999 at 22:38:37, James Robertson wrote:
>>>
>>>>Once again I show my absolute ignorance of assembly with these two questions:
>>>>I am trying to acces the 3rd [+ 4th] byte of a register. How? E.g., what is next
>>>>after al, ah, ?
>>>>How do I pop something off the stack without moving the stack pointer?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>James
>>>
>>>1. Use shift instruction. E.g.
>>>        shr     eax, 16
>>>        mov     byte ptr [esi], al
>>>   You can also use rotate instruction (it'll not destruct
>>>   other bytes):
>>>        ror     eax, 16
>>>        mov     byte ptr [esi], al
>>>        ror     eax, 16
>>>   But if I remember it correctly, rotate is worse than shift
>>>   (cannot be executed in parallel) on both Pentium and P6 family.
>>>2. mov reg32, dword ptr [esp]
>>>
>>>Eugene
>>
>>Ok.... that would work. Because I already have stuff stored in ax, and I know
>>the exact values I want to put into the 'e' part, I wrote:
>>
>>or    eax,0xeeee0000
>>and   eax,0x0000ffff
>>or    eax,0xeeee0000
>>
>>where eeee=what I want to put in. This seems to work. Are there any problems I
>>am missing?
>>
>>James
>
>First instruction is unnecessary - one "and" and one "or" will
>be enough.
>
>Also, try to use 32-bit values instead of 16-bit values where
>possible. 16-bit operations are more expensive than either 8-bit
>or 32-bit.

I'm confused. Aren't these 32 bit values?

James

>
>Eugene



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.