Author: Tony Nichols
Date: 02:46:30 04/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 22, 2005 at 05:29:25, Francisco J. P. wrote: Hi, Francisco >About the opening books thing. > >All right, you say the database stored in the memory isn't fair cause the human >can't do the same thing but, If the opening book has to be erased of the >computer then the same has to be aplied to the human. > I never said this. >It's clear that posibly, of the great openings number a GM knows, let's say only >10% he knows them really. The rest he plays what his memory tells him. It's >clear that at one point, the human had to learn the opening, but at one point he >had to forget the true reason of why to make that move. So the human too plays >opening moves without thinking why he has to do them, only cause his memory >tells him to do them. > As far as I know your memory doesn't tell you to do anything. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by learning the opening if you have to forget the reasons behind the moves. >So, let's make brainwashes to the GMs so they can't cheat against the >computers... I didn't say it was cheating. I just think that if we want to know the true strength of programs we should eliminate the opening books. Regards Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.