Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:51:11 04/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 24, 2005 at 16:45:55, chandler yergin wrote: >On April 24, 2005 at 15:54:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On April 24, 2005 at 12:57:12, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>Even the Deep Blue team is less Biased & more realistic than you are Hyatt! >>> >>>http://www.southerncrossreview.org/2/chess.htm >>> >>>Quoting: >>>"In Scientific American, May 1996, there is an interview with the designers of >>>DB, a parallel system with 16 nodes. "In three minutes, the time allocated for >>>each move in a formal match, the machine can evaluate a total of about 20 >>>billion moves; that is enough to consider every single possible move and >>>countermove 12 sequences ahead and select lines of attack as much as 30 moves >>>beyond that. 'The fact that this ability is still not enough to beat a mere >>>human is amazing', Campbell [one of the six IBM prophets behind DB] says. The >>>lesson, Hoane [another one] adds, is that masters such as Kasparov 'are doing >>>some mysterious computation that we can't figure out.'" >> >>What does that have to do with anything? three minutes +/- X, where X can be up >>to 15-20 minutes based on actually playing games against Deep Thought and deep >>blue prototype... >> >>Times vary wildly. For _all_ programs. >> >>Go read something, or talk to someone, or do something to improve your knowledge >>about computer chess. Shoot, even sitting on a rock alone will probably do >>that... your knowledge is so near zero at the moment... > >You'd sure like to think so wouldn't you? That's the difference between you and I (at least one of them). You "think" while I "know". big difference.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.