Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 02:17:04 09/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 23, 2005 at 10:58:33, Uri Blass wrote:
>On September 23, 2005 at 10:49:43, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On September 23, 2005 at 07:40:16, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote:
>>
>>>Hello Kurt,
>>>
>>>I am really sad becouse I have won easy to Fritz 9.
>>>
>>>I was thinking that was not possible for me to beat Fritz 9 Fritz.
>>>
>>>An engine that is beating so easy has a real serious problem.
>>>
>>>For example, if Zappa 2.0b will be losing games against that easy stone wall,
>>>now, Zappa 2.0b wont be a real strong engine.
>>>
>>>Same opinion about each engine that will be losing gainst me.
>>>
>>>For that reason an engine like Comp Quark is the best for me.
>>>
>>>Look ...... When an strong Dragon could ne destroy with a little finger, the
>>>Dragon change for a little pet.
>>>
>>>
>>>Best,
>>>
>>>Pablo
>>
>> Hi Pablo
>> You have not won the game. Black (Fritz 9) had
>> an advantage of material but exceeded the time
>> for the well-known reasons (no increment time).
>> Had you not promised to play "normal chess" in
>> future and to demonstrate your strength in this way?
>> Best regards
>> Kurt
>
>
>Fritz9 had an advantage of material because pablo sacrificed material when he
>saw that Fritz9 is going to lose on time.
>
>Chessbase claimed that Fritz9 is going to be better against humans and the game
>proved that this claim was a joke.
>
>The game proves that Fritz9 is stupid like other programs and evaluated
>a closed position with equal material as +2 pawns for itself inspite of having
>no plan.
>
>Uri
Hi Uri
What engines ara doing at a 3m+0s level is absolutely
irrelevant for me. I have not received Fritz 9 so far
but assume that it will be a nice a very strong analysis tool.
Best regards
Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com]
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.