Author: A. Cozzie
Date: 18:02:07 09/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 25, 2005 at 07:51:02, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>On September 24, 2005 at 20:00:25, Harvey Williamson wrote:
>
>>This game shows the exciting playing style of the new Hiarcs X:
>>
>>[Event "60m + 15s, rated"]
>>[Site "?"]
>>[Date "2005.09.23"]
>>[Round "?"]
>>[White "Mantilla, Hiarcs 9.0608"]
>>[Black "Adept, TheKing333rs1d S"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>[ECO "D19"]
>>[WhiteElo "2449"]
>>[BlackElo "2364"]
>>[Annotator "Hiarcs 9.0608 (180s)"]
>>[PlyCount "75"]
>>[EventDate "2005.09.23"]
>>[EventType "rapid"]
>>
>>{D19: Slav Defence: 5 a4 Bf5 6 e3: Main line with 9 Qe2 D19: Slav Defence: 5
>>a4 Bf5 6 e3: Main line with 9 Qe2} 1. d4 {[%emt 0:00:00]} d5 {[%emt 0:00:00]}
>>2. c4 {[%emt 0:00:00]} c6 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 3. Nf3 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Nf6 {
>>[%emt 0:00:00]} 4. Nc3 {[%emt 0:00:00]} dxc4 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 5. a4 {
>>[%emt 0:00:00]} Bf5 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 6. e3 {[%emt 0:00:00]} e6 {[%emt 0:00:00]}
>>7. Bxc4 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Bb4 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 8. O-O {[%emt 0:00:00]} O-O {
>>[%emt 0:00:00]} 9. Qe2 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Bg4 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 10. Rd1 {
>>[%emt 0:00:00]} Nbd7 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 11. e4 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Qe7 {
>>[%emt 0:00:00]} 12. h3 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Bxf3 {[%eval 22,12] [%emt 0:01:48]} 13.
>>Qxf3 {[%emt 0:00:00]} e5 {[%eval 24,12] [%emt 0:02:44]} 14. d5 {[%emt 0:00:00]}
>>h6 {[%eval 42,11] [%emt 0:02:42]} 15. dxc6 {[%emt 0:00:00]} bxc6 {
>>. last book move. [%eval 52,12] [%emt 0:02:33]} 16. Ne2 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Nb6 {
>>[%eval 59,12] [%emt 0:03:10]} 17. Bb3 {[%eval 97,15] [%emt 0:00:04]} Rad8 {
>>[%eval 71,11] [%emt 0:01:36]} 18. Ng3 {[%eval 113,15] [%emt 0:03:27]} Rxd1+ {
>>[%eval 84,12] [%emt 0:00:07]} 19. Bxd1 {[%eval 113,15] [%emt 0:01:29]} Rd8 {
>>[%eval 84,11] [%emt 0:00:38]} 20. Nf5 {[%eval 108,15] [%emt 0:04:44]} Qf8 {
>>[%eval 89,13] [%emt 0:00:08]} 21. Be2 {[%eval 111,14] [%emt 0:02:16]} Nbd7 {
>>[%eval 92,12] [%emt 0:00:18]} 22. Bc4 {[%eval 116,14] [%emt 0:01:23]} Bc5 {
>>[%eval 91,12] [%emt 0:02:11]} 23. b3 {[%eval 119,15] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nh7 {
>>[%eval 91,11] [%emt 0:03:15]} 24. b4 $3 {Black is temporarily disorganised and
>>white now strikes while the opportunity exists. This pawn sacrafice deflects
>>the bishop from the a7-g1 diagonal which enables the ensuing combination and
>>28. Nxh6 in particular. [%eval 144,14] [%emt 0:04:12]} (24. Qg3 Kh8 $16) (24.
>>Qh5 Ndf6 25. Qg6 Kh8 26. Bxf7 Nxe4 $14) 24... Bxb4 {
>>. [%eval 21,11] [%emt 0:01:45]} 25. Qh5 {[%eval 104,15] [%emt 0:06:07]} Ndf6 {
>>[%eval 0,12] [%emt 0:02:04]} 26. Qg6 {[%eval 76,15] [%emt 0:00:00]} Kh8 {
>>[%eval -46,12] [%emt 0:02:03]} 27. Bxf7 {[%eval 95,15] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nxe4 {
>>[%eval -27,11] [%emt 0:02:54]} 28. Nxh6 {[%eval 88,14] [%emt 0:00:00]} Rd1+ {
>>[%eval -41,10] [%emt 0:01:30]} (28... Nxf2 29. Nf5 (29. Kxf2 $2 Rd6 30. Qh5
>>Rf6+ 31. Kg1 gxh6 $19) 29... Bc5 30. Kh2 $16) 29. Kh2 $16 {
>>[%eval 108,15] [%emt 0:00:00]} Neg5 {[%eval -46,11] [%emt 0:01:39]} 30. Bxg5 {
>>[%eval 86,14] [%emt 0:02:07]} Rxa1 {[%eval 0,11] [%emt 0:00:39]} 31. Be3 {
>>[%eval 133,14] [%emt 0:00:59]} Qb8 {[%eval 20,11] [%emt 0:01:46]} (31... gxh6
>>$4 {would lead to instant doom} 32. Bxh6 Qxf7 33. Qxf7 $18) 32. Nf5 {
>>[%eval 107,13] [%emt 0:00:23]} Bf8 {[%eval 37,11] [%emt 0:00:58]} 33. Qg4 {
>>[%eval 93,13] [%emt 0:00:05]} (33. Qxc6 $6 Nf6 $11) 33... Qd8 {
>>[%eval 72,11] [%emt 0:02:42]} 34. Nh4 {[%eval 143,13] [%emt 0:00:00]} g5 {
>>[%eval 29,10] [%emt 0:00:27]} 35. Ng6+ {[%eval 148,13] [%emt 0:01:07]} Kg7 {
>>[%eval 105,2] [%emt 0:00:00]} 36. Bb3 {[%eval 148,14] [%emt 0:01:59]} Bd6 $2 {
>>[%eval 42,11] [%emt 0:01:09]} (36... Rb1 37. Nxf8 Nxf8 (37... Qxf8 $4 38. Bxg5
>>Rxb3 39. Be7+ Kh8 40. Bxf8 Nxf8 41. Qh4+ Kg7 42. Qe7+ Kg8 43. Qxa7 $18) 38.
>>Bxg5 Qd7 $18) (36... Kxg6 $4 37. Qe4+ $18 Kg7 38. Bc2 Nf6 $2 39. Qg6+ {mates}
>>Kh8 40. Bxg5 $18) 37. Nf4 {
>>A startling move, after which black collapses [%eval 183,13] [%emt 0:01:55]}
>>Kh8 {[%eval 234,12] [%emt 0:06:03]} (37... exf4 $2 {Theme: Deflection from d4}
>>38. Bd4+ Kf8 39. Qf5+ Nf6 40. Bxf6 $18) 38. Ne6 {Adept,TheKing333rs1d S
>>resigns (Lag: Av=0.19s, max=0.6s) [%eval 594,15] [%emt 0:00:00]} (38. Ne6 Qg8
>>39. Qf5 $18) 1-0
>
>Your comments are superficial IMHO. 24.b4 followed by 25.Qh5 was not good at
>all.
>With the Bishop pair, the better pawn structure and the strong knight at f5
>white had practically a won position before move 24.
>After the forced moves 25...Ndf6 26.Qg6 Kh8 27.Bxf7 black was greedy and took
>the pawn on e4 which gave white the chance to a nice finish.
>Yet after 27...Bc5! 28.Kh2 (28.Bxb2 Bxf2+)Nxe4 29.Nxh6 Nd6 30.Bg8 Nf6
>white is not better.
>Thus 24.b4 followed by 25.Qh5 was a mistake.
>
>Michael
You don't have to be quite so harsh. After all, its impossible to win unless
your opponent makes a mistake.
Actually, I think this game is a great example of why Fruit is such a commercial
killer. They have all jacked their kingsafety values so high (because then they
slaughter amateur programs) that Fruit just takes the piece and wins.
anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.