Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:12:53 09/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2005 at 12:02:01, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>On September 26, 2005 at 11:00:56, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >> >>>Let me guess, these "wins" were on time? > >But it says _very_ little about strength and has no value in terms of usability. I disagree. The simple fact that the game prove again(pablo already proved it earlier) is that Fritz9 was not optimized to play better against humans because the first thing that I expect chessbase to do in case that they care about games against humans is to stop pablo and his friends from getting these type of position when Fritz is unable to do progress. It can be done by a better evaluation function for this type of positions(something that was not done by chessbase). >And the most pathetic thing about these games is that server lag is probably the >most likely reason as to why these engines lose on time! Yes but if you look at the games you can understand that weak humans can still get a draw easily against Fritz even without the lag problem. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.