Author: Günther Simon
Date: 02:17:37 11/07/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2005 at 16:43:46, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 06, 2005 at 16:19:26, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>On November 06, 2005 at 15:49:45, Günther Simon wrote: >> >>>On November 06, 2005 at 09:39:43, Bertil Eklund wrote: >>> >>>>On November 06, 2005 at 00:44:59, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>There was a claim in another discussion that the ssdf is in principle against >>>>>testing humans. >>>>> >>>>>The claim was not by ssdf tester and if it is correct I want to read it from >>>>>ssdf testers. >>>>> >>>>>I always thought that the problem is that humans are not available for playing >>>>>matches of 40 games against Fruit and Fritz and other programs and paying humans >>>>>money and checking that the humans do not cheat is too expensive. >>>>> >>>>>I always thought that ssdf is going to include humans in the list in case that >>>>>there is a sponsor to pay for that purpose. >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>>The idea has always been to compare programs against humans in tournaments. >>>>Especially in the past days a good player could learn to play the same lines >>>>over and over winning the same game again and again. >>>> >>>>Bertil >>> >>>Is this a 'yes' or a 'no' to Uris question? >>> >>>Guenther >> >>Yes, in the best of worlds a lot of humans could be included to give a "true" >>rating comparison. >> >>Bertil > >It is clear that it is 'yes' to what I thought but not 'yes' to the question in >the title of the thread. > >Uri I see only one question in your original post and that is in the header marked by a question mark. I have asked for an answer to your question and Bertil said 'yes', thus I don't see any doubts left, except you believe either Bertil missunderstod you or did not say the truth. Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.