Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:43:46 11/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2005 at 16:19:26, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On November 06, 2005 at 15:49:45, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On November 06, 2005 at 09:39:43, Bertil Eklund wrote: >> >>>On November 06, 2005 at 00:44:59, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>There was a claim in another discussion that the ssdf is in principle against >>>>testing humans. >>>> >>>>The claim was not by ssdf tester and if it is correct I want to read it from >>>>ssdf testers. >>>> >>>>I always thought that the problem is that humans are not available for playing >>>>matches of 40 games against Fruit and Fritz and other programs and paying humans >>>>money and checking that the humans do not cheat is too expensive. >>>> >>>>I always thought that ssdf is going to include humans in the list in case that >>>>there is a sponsor to pay for that purpose. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>The idea has always been to compare programs against humans in tournaments. >>>Especially in the past days a good player could learn to play the same lines >>>over and over winning the same game again and again. >>> >>>Bertil >> >>Is this a 'yes' or a 'no' to Uris question? >> >>Guenther > >Yes, in the best of worlds a lot of humans could be included to give a "true" >rating comparison. > >Bertil It is clear that it is 'yes' to what I thought but not 'yes' to the question in the title of the thread. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.