Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 14:55:29 11/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2005 at 17:42:56, John Merlino wrote: >On November 16, 2005 at 17:35:29, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On November 16, 2005 at 17:04:23, Joachim Rang wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>In my tuning for Fruit I stumbled over the following game when a very promising >>>looking sacrifice does seem to loose the game. After that white can compromise >>>blacks king side completely but seems unable to proceed the attack and loose >>>afterwards. I have analyzed this and it does indeed seem the game continuation >>>is rather forced and leads to a inferior position of white: >>> >>[D]rqrb2k1/5pp1/2b2P1p/p2n1n1P/1p2N3/1N2BB2/PPP2Q2/1K1R3R w - - 0 27 am Bxh6?! > >That's the way it looks to me, but the program will have to see at least 24 >plies ahead (pretty tough with that much wood on the board) to see the problem. > >It also looks like 34.c4 Ne3 35.Rd5 Nxd5 36.Nxf7+ Rxf7 37.Bxd5 Re7 38.Rf1 Rxh7 >39.Rf2 might be a slight improvement, but I don't have the time to really check >it out. > >jm Yes it is incredible deep. :-) 34.c4 is probably a better defense for white but in your line white is the exchange down and I don't see enough compensation for that for white. The 34th move is the first move where there are really alternatives for white perhaps 34.c3 as well but white is already worse on move 34 I think. Joacchim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.