Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 05:34:55 01/31/06
Go up one level in this thread
Hi David, Thx David for the explanation. I have been thinking, that possible chess way solution for a long way strategic, are so hight, that in "strategic ways", only human beings have oportunitie to see with a simple evaluation, what could be happening in a long way. A theoric chess solution for a game for itself, is a math problem, with an exactly answer for all; but today, chess to continue beeing a philosofie art too. Human beings can produce philosofie ideas, maybe engines have not that kind of capacitie by itlselft in our days. I am fighting against engines and love to play chess against engines, but is a match for me to discover the akiles talion in engines, the exacly point where the war chess combat could be cancel. I f I was what I am not (a mathematic man and a chess computer programer) On January 31, 2006 at 04:12:11, David B Weller wrote: >Hi Pablo, > >What you describe is certainly 'an' horizon effect which might also be called >'near sightedness' but THE 'horizon effect' which is a term used by the chess >programmers, I think, and is described very well by Mr Hyatt below.... > >When the computer manages to stick its head in the sand, and pretend all is well >when it is not. This is pretty facinating when you think that a machine manifest >such a 'human' behaviour of denial :) > >-David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.