Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: How Strong is Hiarcs 10?

Author: Mark R. Anderson

Date: 08:32:31 02/10/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 10, 2006 at 10:47:48, Sarah Reynolds wrote:

>This program to me seems stronger then Rykba, it plays a mean game of chess and
>doesn't give the human player any chances at all, great program i think.

Sarah,

I agree that Hiarcs 10 is a very strong engine, that it plays a mean game and
doesn't give the human play any chances, and that it's a great program.  Having
said that, I must disagree with your other statement .... as much as I love
Hiarcs and its very nice style and capabilities, Rybka is most definitely
stronger.  All of our testing and also inspection of the games between the
engines confirms this many times.

Hiarcs is a wonderful analysis engine ... it is very strong tactically (one of
the top 4 or 5), plays very good speed chess, has a very good positional game, a
very human-like style that is also very active and agressive, and also has good
PV evaluation numbers.  It also has a good endgame, but not as good as Shredder.
 I use it more than Fritz, Shredder, Fruit and Junior for analysis generally.
However, I have been extremely impressed by Rybka's play and results (haven't we
all?) and when using it to help analyze top human GM games, I find that it finds
the "human" line of play better than other engines, and it finds these moves
rather quickly also, which is impressive.  Also, it is positionally without
peer, IMHO.

The present version (1.01 Beta 13b) is a real beast, but when the final verizon
comes out with improved search and also endgame heuristics, it will be a true
monster.  Oh, one more thing ... I agree with another poster here that Rybka
"spots" and frustrates attempts to use closed positions and other
"anti-computer" strategies to get draws or occasional wins.  Recently, my
girlfriend was really impressed when she saw me get a draw in a game with Tiger
15 at Game/20.  I said, "Thanks, I think I played pretty well, but this one will
bring me down to earth."  I then played a similar game with Rybka, and it
basically turned my game into ground hamburger ... not a pretty sight.  She just
said, "Oh, that must be the really strong one you talk about."  I said, "Yes,
there's no fooling the Monster."  (What's Russian for "Big Monster?"  "Little
Fish" doesn't seem to do justice to this one.)

Mark Anderson



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.